![]() ![]() But, is it possible that with a limited bankroll that the "least losing" strategy includes some hedging to protect bankroll and keep you in the game long enough to see a shooter go on a long roll? With an unlimited bankroll, optimal strategy would be to place only the bets with the lowest house edge. When the 7-out comes next roll, is it better to have had the lowest possible average house edge, or is it better to get $30 of that $100 back because you placed a $6 hop 7 bet? I'm guessing you'll respond by saying that because a 7 rolls every 6.14 rolls I will have spent $36+ on average to win that $30, but I'm really not sure its quite as cut and dry as that. Doesn't building your strategy around the concept of minimizing the average house edge assume that you have an unlimited bankroll to survive a bad run? I mean, if I have $100 in bets out there with most of it on the passline odds and come odds we can say that maybe the house has a 1-2% average edge. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |